Do you think the game would have been better off using an original story like MUA did? Or was Civil War a brilliant idea?
Personally, as much as I agree that this game’s story is far better than MUA’s, it is a game first and foremost and I do not think that the Civil War offered lots of creative potential.
Yes, MUA had a weak and messy story, but thanks to how it zigzagged through numerous parts of the Marvel Universe, it allowed us to us adventure in Atlantis, Murderworld, Mephisto’s Realm, Shi’ar and Skrull planets, Doom’s Castle, Asgard, and other creative settings.
Those settings are far more interesting and visually appealing than all the governmental, political settings of MUA2. They leave little to explore and significantly limit the creativity.
For example, noticed that most of the enemies we fight in MUA2 are gun-wielding soldiers/officers/guardsmen? How does that compare to MUA which features all types of creative foes such as Atlanteans, Demons, Clowns, Robots, Aliens, and Godly/Mystical beings?
So, for story’s sake, I think the Civil War was a smart decision. However, this is a game series first and foremost and too much creative potential was sacrificed to make it happen. So overall, I think it was a bad idea. Had they gone with a story that explored more interesting worlds and locations of the Marvel Universe, the game would have been more interesting.
I hope they do not repeat this. MUA3’s creativity, if it’s made, shouldn’t be restricted to a story that revolves around D.C. buildings, city streets, and tunnels. Yes, Latveria and Wakanda were quite interesting, but what about the other 90% of the game?








